As the use of cellphones has pervaded every space on civilized Earth, those who do not wish to be subjected to the constant one sided chatter are heralding the wider use of cellphone jammers.
The cellphone jammer is not new, The jamming technology works by sending out a radio signal sufficiently powerful to override phones communication with cell towers. The range varies from several feet to several yards, and the devices cost from $50 to several hundred dollars. Larger models can be left on permanently to create a no-call zone. Exporters of jammers say demand is rising, with hundreds a month bound for the United States. The buyers include owners of cafes and hair salons, hoteliers, public speakers, theater operators, bus drivers and, increasingly, commuters on public transportation.
The popularity of this device has raised scrutiny from federal regulators and concern from the cellphone industry.
And it all stems from the lack of social responsiblity of users. But this ‘its all about me’ attitude is not restricted to the use of technology. Skyrocketing health costs, increasing road rage, neigbor-stress, all stem from individuals forcing their world, without responsibility for the impact, at the expense of others.
The unfortunate this is that jammers punish not only the offender, but also more discreet chatterers and emergency related workers.
In this case, both parties could he held as self focused; each believing their rights are above those around him/her.
I guess it comes down to what constitutes a reasonable expectation. One could not reasonably expect to receive a cellphone call in a restaurant, cinema or theater. On a commuter transport and othe close proximity public places, maybe calls could be restricted to receiving one minute voice clips, prompting a text message response.
Currently, using the jammers is illegal in the United States. The radio frequencies used by cellphone carriers are protected; the Federal Communication Commission can fine jammers up to $11,000 for a first offense.
Esmart